nobot.stories

Archive for June, 2004

Stand and deliver…you’re money or your life…SHOCK, UUUH

Last Thursday night, I caught a cold.  Sore throat wouldn’t go away, so today I went to get some medicine for it.  Fairly standard, and I’d done it millions of times before.  Today was different.  Just a tinge………

 

I’m one of 40 million+ Americans currently without health insurance (just started working again and it takes some time to click in).  The routine walk-in doctor’s visit cost $95.00 (AFTER a 10% discount…yippeee!) and an hour of my time; filling the prescription would’ve cost another $98.00 if I actually filled the full prescription slip.  It would’ve been $193 and 2 hours on my day off, just to take care of a cough.

 

Yet it was only $120 and two hours because I didn’t buy the prescribed antibiotics.  Here’s why:  They consisted of only 6 pills in a special package that cost … sit down … $73.00.

 

No, this wasn’t an HIV cocktail, just “the latest” antibiotics for treating  cold-induced throat soreness.  After claiming post-Weimar fascism, I asked the unfortunate pharmacist how much said pills would’ve cost if I HAD insurance.  “Around $25.00″.  He paused.  “Yes, I know, things are getting a bit out of hand…”.

 

Just a tinge…

 

God forbid someone without insurance catches a cold, let alone a serious illness, in this nation.  It makes complete sense why people were refinancing their home mortgages…they needed money to live with.  It’ll be sad to see them not afford to breathe when rates rise.

 

There’s NO WAY this system of profligate, priced-out living will sustain in this country.  Something’s gotta give, and it will.  Very, very soon.


Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!

Comments

Fahrenheit 9/11 in OC



Hi all,

 

I went and saw Moore’s Fahrenheit 9/11 in a packed theatre in Irvine, California over the weekend.  It was a 2:15PM showing that, despite the generally conservative Orange County atmosphere, managed to trigger two lines covering the theatre’s side of the shopping complex — one line for ticket holders, the other for ticket buyers — both for the same show time.  The line for the show following mine was twice as long on both sides.

 

People attending were mostly White and Asian, yet of many ages (MANY elderly, in fact).  People were crying, laughing, gasping and cursing at the screen for two solid hours.  The loudest they got was after the segment image of George W. Bush was shown attempting empathy with the parents of lost military personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan — people screamed obscenities in a visceral, pre-riot manner reminiscent of a WTO protest.  Haven’t seen anything like that in the community of Irvine before, and I lived there for 5 years.

 

During the film’s image of the Iraqi parent crying and screaming appeals to God in Arabic upon the loss of her child, a few Arabic or Mid-Eastern audience members (presumably) repeated her words in Arabic by yelling in the theatre.  I sense it was these same people, a few elderly Mid-Easterners, who were crying upon exiting the theatre.

 

Indeed, upon exiting, I hung out for a bit.  Fifty and sixty-something American parents were crying and cursing, while still a few guys were shaking their heads and complaining over anecdotes like showing the vapid Britney Spears and the use of the “Bonanza” TV-theme and image.  Certain people huddled and talked about how they felt like they needed to see it again in order to fully absorb the information presented in the film on items such as The Carlyle Group, Unocal’s pipeline project in Afghanistan, the post-Iraq-invasion energy conference coverage and other rarely publicly exhibited current affairs tidbits. 

 

I also spoke with the voter registration crew out in front of the theatre.  They informed me of the high value of registering for the November 2nd Presidential Election in a manner that would leave a PAPER TRAIL.  I.E. Registering via absentee ballot or being prepared to submit a paper ballot on election day.  Apparently, a voter machine company, local to Orange County, has been procured by the County for the elections…

 

Despite it’s “independent film” status and modest (by Spiderman, Dodgeball and White Chicks standards) national distribution, this movie was certainly an “event film”.  I would urge you to see it if you haven’t, and let other citizens know about it, especially any of your conservative friends, regardless of what anyone thinks of Moore.  There are certain indisputably important macro-economic and political issues touched upon in the film that I sense will rarely, if ever, appear in any prominent domestically produced audio-visual media product again.  I’m shocked yet impressed, frankly, that he was able to include some of these issues in the final cut.

 



Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.

Comments

It makes complete sense now why the nickname of the guy featured below is “Dick”.

 

It’s hard not to think back to former Enron President, COO and CEO Jeff Skilling’s conference call with an analyst in April, 2001 (pre-Enron-Meltdown) where Skilling exclaimed, “”Well, thank you very much, we appreciate that. Asshole.” [http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/special/enron/2404018].  These Alpha-Dolts are all cut from the same, “folksy” (read: vulgar) cloth, regardless of their statures or responsibilities:

 

 





The New York Times




June 26, 2004

Cheney Owns Up to Profanity Incident and Says He ‘Felt Better Afterwards’

By RICHARD W. STEVENSON





SIOUX CITY, Iowa, June 25 - Vice President Dick Cheney, long portrayed by his aides as unperturbed by partisan attacks, admitted Friday that he “probably” cursed at a senior Democratic senator this week, said he did not regret it and added that he “felt better afterwards.”


Then Mr. Cheney quickly reverted to type, flying here for a tightly scripted campaign rally where he never mentioned the incident in a speech on terrorism and the economy to an adoring Republican crowd.


The revelation, if that is what it was, that Mr. Cheney is comfortable with the use of four-letter words and is willing to direct them at political opponents, was the latest in a string of developments over the past few weeks that have put the vice president squarely in the spotlight. And as he takes on a higher political profile, it is hard to tell who is happier, Republicans or Democrats.


At the rally here, Mr. Cheney was immediately forgiven by some members of the invited crowd for swearing at Senator Patrick J. Leahy of Vermont on the Senate floor on Tuesday. It showed him, they said, to be a real person who is forceful in the face of unwarranted criticism.


“It tells me Cheney is very human,” said Dennis Lumphrey, a hospital worker from Moville, Iowa, who was in the crowd. “It also tells me he’s not going to get pushed around. He’ll fight back. A lot of people around the world want to tell America what to do. We need to have our own direction and priorities.”


President Bush’s political aides said they anticipated no negative aftereffects. In fact, the White House announced that Mr. Cheney’s campaign schedule would only intensify. Next weekend, he will take a bus tour through Ohio, West Virginia and Pennsylvania. And senior Republicans said he had proved himself a voice of wisdom and reassurance to voters on the two big topics of the race, the economy and the fight against terrorism.


“He’s a tremendous asset to the Republican party,” said Ed Gillespie, chairman of the Republican National Committee. “The rank-and-file Republican voters out there just love Dick Cheney. They appreciate his loyalty to the president, and they appreciate that he feels solid.”


But Mr. Cheney has been drawing even more partisan fire than usual over the last few weeks. His aggressive defense of the administration’s assertions that Iraq was working with Al Qaeda intensified the long-running partisan and ideological clash over whether he helped lead the nation to war under false pretenses.


He won a short-term legal victory when the Supreme Court ruled Thursday that a lower court had acted “prematurely” when it rejected his request to block disclosure of records from his energy policy task force. But the ruling brought the issue to the fore again, allowing Democrats to renew their attacks that he has sought to work behind closed doors to further the interests of energy companies.


Now more than ever, his opponents call Mr. Cheney among the most polarizing figures in politics. Democrats portray him as the power behind the throne and the personification of militarism, corporate corruption and government secrecy.


“We’ve got to get the White House back from a man who has abused his power as the leader of the free world,” the comedian Billy Crystal told the crowd at a Democratic fund-raiser in Los Angeles on Thursday night. “Dick Cheney has got to go.”


Mr. Bush’s Democratic rival, Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts, regularly repeats Mr. Cheney’s name in much the same way Republicans have long used that of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton- as a symbol of all that is wrong with the policies and personalities of the opposing party.


“Cheney’s definitely turned into a big, fat albatross around the president’s neck,” said Jim Jordan, Mr. Kerry’s former campaign manager.


“His public image is very bad and getting worse,” Mr. Jordan said. Mr. Cheney’s aides and supporters said one of his great strengths as a campaigner was his ability to remain stoic about the way he is portrayed by Democrats and immune from the pressures of responding to the ups and downs of daily news cycles.


But the exchange with Mr. Leahy on Tuesday suggested that Democrats manage to get under Mr. Cheney’s skin.


Interviewed by Fox News on Friday after a speech in Saginaw, Mich., Mr. Cheney did not specifically acknowledge using the expletive that he has been widely reported to have used. “Well, I expressed myself rather forcefully, felt better after I had done it,” Mr. Cheney said. Asked whether he was angry about Mr. Leahy’s suggestions that the Halliburton Company had received no-bid contracts in Iraq because Mr. Cheney ran the company before joining the Republican ticket four years ago, the vice president said that was part of it.


“Also, it had to do with - he is the kind of individual who will make those kinds of charges and then come after you as though he’s your best friend,” Mr. Cheney said.


Mr. Leahy’s aides said the incident occurred when Mr. Cheney gathered with members of the Senate for a formal portrait on the Senate floor on Tuesday. Mr. Leahy was chatting with Republicans, they said, when he spied Mr. Cheney and approached him. When Mr. Cheney turned away, Mr. Leahy, the aides said, joked that the vice president was unwilling to talk to Democrats.


After Mr. Cheney expressed his “dissatisfaction” with Mr. Leahy, as the vice president put it to Fox News, Mr. Leahy “told Mr. Cheney that he and Senate Democrats didn’t appreciate being called anti-Catholic,” said David Carle, Mr. Leahy’s spokesman. Mr. Leahy was referring to Republican accusations that Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee were “anti-Catholic” because they refused to confirm a judicial nominee, William H. Pryor Jr., who opposed abortion. Mr. Leahy is the senior Democrat on the panel.


Then Mr. Cheney stalked off, Mr. Leahy’s aides said, using an obscene phrase to describe what he thought Mr. Leahy should do.


In a statement issued after Fox News broadcast its interview with Mr. Cheney, Mr. Carle said, “It appears the vice president’s previous calls for civility are now inoperative.”


By forcing Mr. Cheney to address his personal conduct, the incident brought a rare moment of improvisation to the vice president’s campaign, which has so far been a highly orchestrated affair directed primarily at raising money and rousing the Republican faithful.


Mr. Cheney does not do rapid response, the daily back and forth between the campaigns, and he rarely addresses issues like education or Mr. Bush’s “compassionate conservative” agenda. He plays the traditional vice-presidential role of attacking the opposition, but his stump speech parrots the same lines about Mr. Kerry that Mr. Bush uses in his speeches.


Mr. Cheney’s strength, his aides and supporters said, is in setting out what the stakes are in the election.


“We’ll have him do what he does best and has done best, which is to take the needed step back to provide perspective about the challenges we face and the policies we need,” said Mary Matalin, a former senior aide to Mr. Cheney who will join him on the campaign trail this summer. “He’s a political reality zone.”


To soften up Mr. Cheney’s somewhat wooden public persona, he is often introduced, as he was here, by his wife, Lynne Cheney. She told a story about how she wore a strapless red dress made by her grandmother on her first date with Mr. Cheney and how she credited the dress with their having a second date.


Republican strategists said Mr. Cheney, a former House member, takes a keen interest in the nuts and bolts of electoral politics.


“He has a very well developed sense of campaign strategy and campaign tactics,” said one prominent Republican in Washington who has close ties to Mr. Cheney. “He understands how to read a poll and the cross tabs. He’ll delve into message and the things that inform campaign decisions. But he’s less likely to involve himself in detail than to try to spark people’s thinking or challenge people’s thinking.”



Sheryl Gay Stolberg contributed reporting for this article.



Do you Yahoo!?
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.

Comments

Please don’t rock my vote. ‘Cause I don’t like my vote to be rocked.

“My point is that no enough people vote. If they did
I’m sure things would be a bit different.”

This is the political equivalent of the gambler’s
fallacy. “Just keep betting on red.”

In Peru, voting is mandatory. The vote is 100%, all
the time. Despite that, there’s not exactly gourmet
leadership in my native land.

The problem with the US is not the lack of quantity of
vote, but rather with the interruption of said voter
influence, by giant PAC’s (Political Action Groups)
and affluent lobbies. Their monied influence makes
the orbit of government go consistently off axis.

Why else, do we have expensive congressmen (with a
lower case “c”) spending valuable time on making sure
that battered, frozen, french fries are considered a
“fresh vegetable” by the FDA? Who in their right mind
would vote for that? Or vote for something equally
crazy, like a land war in Indo China, under the guise
of communism containment, or something nuts like
making it illegal for Medicare to use it’s buying
power to negotiate lower rates on prescription drug,
or something really crazy like, I don’t know, like
invading Iraq under the guise of fighting terrorism.

The moral of the story, then, young Sean, is that one
can rock the proverbial vote till the cows come home.
It won’t be until one gets rid of the vile influence
of campaign cash that these votes will do any good.

Till then, vote Kerry.

Comments

Why the US/UK are over there


Why Saddam Hussein was removed:

“[Tight oil] markets have increased US and global vulnerability to disruption and provided adversaries undue potential influence over the price of oil. Iraq has become a key ’swing’ producer, posing a difficult situation for the US government … Iraq remains a de-stabilizing influence to … the flow of oil to international markets from the Middle East. Saddam Hussein has also demonstrated a willingness to threaten to use the oil weapon and to use his own export programme to manipulate oil markets.”  [my emphasis added]

- “Strategic Energy Policy Challenges For the 21st Century, ” Report of an Independent Task Force, Sponsored by the James A. Baker Institute for Public Policy of Rice University and the Council on Foreign Relations. April, 2001.

www.bakerinstitute.org/Pubs/studies/bipp_study_15/bippstudy15.html

(The Baker Institute is headed by James A. Baker, III, Secretary
of State under President George H.W. Bush).


The perceived key reason for staying there and building, from America’s perspective (GOP OR Democrats):

“The reason the United States has a legitimate and critical interest in seeing that Persian Gulf oil continues to flow copiously and relatively cheaply is simply that the global economy built over the last 50 years rests on a foundation of inexpensive, plentiful oil, and if that foundation were removed, the global economy would collapse.”

- Kenneth Pollack, former Clinton advisor, ”Foreign Affairs” magazine, July / August 2003, pp. 2-4.


Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out!

Comments

« Previous entries